<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Generic Samples &#187; research</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.genericsamples.com/wp/tag/research/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.genericsamples.com/wp</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 02:36:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Systematic review and economic modelling of the effectiveness and&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.genericsamples.com/wp/systematic-review-and-economic-modelling-of-the-effectiveness-and/</link>
		<comments>http://www.genericsamples.com/wp/systematic-review-and-economic-modelling-of-the-effectiveness-and/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 15:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health technol assess]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.genericsamples.com/wp/systematic-review-and-economic-modelling-of-the-effectiveness-and/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Systematic review and economic modelling of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of non-surgical treatments for women with stress urinary incontinence. Health Technol Assess. 2010 Aug;14(40):1-506 Authors: Imamura M, Abrams P, Bain C, Buckley B, Cardozo L, Cody J, Cook J, Eustice S, Glazener C, Grant A, Hay-Smith J, Hislop J, Jenkinson D, Kilonzo M, Nabi G, N'dow J, Pickard R, Ternent L, Wallace S, Wardle J, Zhu S, Vale L OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of non-surgical treatments for women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) through systematic review and economic modelling. DATA SOURCES: The Cochrane Incontinence Group Specialised Register, electronic databases and the websites of relevant professional organisations and manufacturers, and the following databases: CINAHL, EMBASE, BIOSIS, Science Citation Index and Social Science Citation Index, Current Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov and the UKCRN Portfolio Database. STUDY SELECTION: The study comprised three distinct elements. (1) A survey of 188 women with SUI to identify outcomes of importance to them (activities of daily living; sex, hygiene and lifestyle issues; emotional health; and the availability of services). (2) A systematic review and meta-analysis of non-surgical treatments for SUI to find out which are most effective by comparing results of trials (direct pairwise comparisons) and by modelling results (mixed-treatment comparisons - MTCs). A total of 88 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs reporting data from 9721 women were identified, considering five generic interventions [pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT), electrical stimulation (ES), vaginal cones (VCs), bladder training (BT) and serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) medications], in many variations and combinations. Data were available for 37 interventions and 68 treatment comparisons by direct pairwise assessment. Mixed-treatment comparison models compared 14 interventions, using data from 55 trials (6608 women). (3) Economic modelling, using a Markov model, to find out which combinations of treatments (treatment pathways) are most cost-effective for SUI. DATA EXTRACTION: Titles and abstracts identified were assessed by one reviewer and full-text copies of all potentially relevant reports independently assessed by two reviewers. Any disagreements were resolved by consensus or arbitration by a third person. RESULTS: Direct pairwise comparison and MTC analysis showed that the treatments were more effective than no treatment. Delivering PFMT in a more intense fashion, either through extra sessions or with biofeedback (BF), appeared to be the most effective treatment [PFMT extra sessions vs no treatment (NT) odds ratio (OR) 10.7, 95% credible interval (CrI) 5.03 to 26.2; PFMT + BF vs NT OR 12.3, 95% CrI 5.35 to 32.7]. Only when success was measured in terms of improvement was there evidence that basic PFMT was better than no treatment (PFMT basic vs NT OR 4.47, 95% CrI 2.03 to 11.9). Analysis of cost-effectiveness showed that for cure rates, the strategy using lifestyle changes and PFMT with extra sessions followed by tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) (lifestyle advice-PFMT extra sessions-TVT) had a probability of greater than 70% of being considered cost-effective for all threshold values for willingness to pay for a QALY up to 50,000 pounds. For improvement rates, lifestyle advice-PFMT extra sessions-TVT had a probability of greater than 50% of being considered cost-effective when society's willingness to pay for an additional QALY was more than 10,000 pounds. The results were most sensitive to changes in the long-term performance of PFMT and also in the relative effectiveness of basic PFMT and PFMT with extra sessions. LIMITATIONS: Although a large number of studies were identified, few data were available for most comparisons and long-term data were sparse. Challenges for evidence synthesis were the lack of consensus on the most appropriate method for assessing incontinence and intervention protocols that were complex and varied considerably across studies. CONCLUSIONS: More intensive forms of PFMT appear worthwhile, but further research is required to define an optimal form of more intensive therapy that is feasible and efficient for the NHS to provide, along with further definitive evidence from large, well-designed studies. PMID: 20738930 [PubMed - in process] ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Systematic review and economic modelling of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of non-surgical treatments for women with stress urinary incontinence. Health Technol Assess. 2010 Aug;14(40):1-506 Authors: Imamura M, Abrams P, Bain C, Buckley B, Cardozo L, Cody J, Cook J, Eustice S, Glazener C, Grant A, Hay-Smith J, Hislop J, Jenkinson D, Kilonzo M, Nabi G, N&#8217;dow J, Pickard R, Ternent L, Wallace S, Wardle J, Zhu S, Vale L OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of non-surgical treatments for women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) through systematic review and economic modelling. DATA SOURCES: The Cochrane Incontinence Group Specialised Register, electronic databases and the websites of relevant professional organisations and manufacturers, and the following databases: CINAHL, EMBASE, BIOSIS, Science Citation Index and Social Science Citation Index, Current Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov and the UKCRN Portfolio Database. STUDY SELECTION: The study comprised three distinct elements. (1) A survey of 188 women with SUI to identify outcomes of importance to them (activities of daily living; sex, hygiene and lifestyle issues; emotional health; and the availability of services). (2) A systematic review and meta-analysis of non-surgical treatments for SUI to find out which are most effective by comparing results of trials (direct pairwise comparisons) and by modelling results (mixed-treatment comparisons &#8211; MTCs). A total of 88 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs reporting data from 9721 women were identified, considering five generic interventions [pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT), electrical stimulation (ES), vaginal cones (VCs), bladder training (BT) and serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) medications], in many variations and combinations. Data were available for 37 interventions and 68 treatment comparisons by direct pairwise assessment. Mixed-treatment comparison models compared 14 interventions, using data from 55 trials (6608 women). (3) Economic modelling, using a Markov model, to find out which combinations of treatments (treatment pathways) are most cost-effective for SUI. DATA EXTRACTION: Titles and abstracts identified were assessed by one reviewer and full-text copies of all potentially relevant reports independently assessed by two reviewers. Any disagreements were resolved by consensus or arbitration by a third person. RESULTS: Direct pairwise comparison and MTC analysis showed that the treatments were more effective than no treatment. Delivering PFMT in a more intense fashion, either through extra sessions or with biofeedback (BF), appeared to be the most effective treatment [PFMT extra sessions vs no treatment (NT) odds ratio (OR) 10.7, 95% credible interval (CrI) 5.03 to 26.2; PFMT + BF vs NT OR 12.3, 95% CrI 5.35 to 32.7]. Only when success was measured in terms of improvement was there evidence that basic PFMT was better than no treatment (PFMT basic vs NT OR 4.47, 95% CrI 2.03 to 11.9). Analysis of cost-effectiveness showed that for cure rates, the strategy using lifestyle changes and PFMT with extra sessions followed by tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) (lifestyle advice-PFMT extra sessions-TVT) had a probability of greater than 70% of being considered cost-effective for all threshold values for willingness to pay for a QALY up to 50,000 pounds. For improvement rates, lifestyle advice-PFMT extra sessions-TVT had a probability of greater than 50% of being considered cost-effective when society&#8217;s willingness to pay for an additional QALY was more than 10,000 pounds. The results were most sensitive to changes in the long-term performance of PFMT and also in the relative effectiveness of basic PFMT and PFMT with extra sessions. LIMITATIONS: Although a large number of studies were identified, few data were available for most comparisons and long-term data were sparse. Challenges for evidence synthesis were the lack of consensus on the most appropriate method for assessing incontinence and intervention protocols that were complex and varied considerably across studies. CONCLUSIONS: More intensive forms of PFMT appear worthwhile, but further research is required to define an optimal form of more intensive therapy that is feasible and efficient for the NHS to provide, along with further definitive evidence from large, well-designed studies. PMID: 20738930 [PubMed - in process] </p>
<p>Continue reading here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?tmpl=NoSidebarfile&amp;db=PubMed&amp;cmd=Retrieve&amp;list_uids=20738930&amp;dopt=Abstract" title="Systematic review and economic modelling of the effectiveness and...">Systematic review and economic modelling of the effectiveness and&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.genericsamples.com/wp/systematic-review-and-economic-modelling-of-the-effectiveness-and/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lovastatin induces apoptosis of ovarian cancer cells and synergizes with&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.genericsamples.com/wp/lovastatin-induces-apoptosis-of-ovarian-cancer-cells-and-synergizes-with/</link>
		<comments>http://www.genericsamples.com/wp/lovastatin-induces-apoptosis-of-ovarian-cancer-cells-and-synergizes-with/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 10:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[combination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[synergizes-with]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.genericsamples.com/wp/lovastatin-induces-apoptosis-of-ovarian-cancer-cells-and-synergizes-with/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Related Articles Lovastatin induces apoptosis of ovarian cancer cells and synergizes with doxorubicin: potential therapeutic relevance. BMC Cancer. 2010 Mar 18;10(1):103 Authors: Martirosyan A, Clendening JW, Goard CA, Penn LZ ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Ovarian carcinoma is a rarely curable disease, for which new treatment options are required. As agents that block HMG-CoA reductase and the mevalonate pathway, the statin family of drugs are used in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia and have been shown to trigger apoptosis in a tumor-specific manner. Recent clinical trials show that the addition of statins to traditional chemotherapeutic strategies can increase efficacy of targeting statin-sensitive tumors. Our goal was to assess statin-induced apoptosis of ovarian cancer cells, either alone or in combination with chemotherapeutics, and then determine these mechanisms of action. METHODS: The effect of lovastatin on ovarian cancer cell lines was evaluated alone and in combination with cisplatin and doxorubicin using several assays (MTT, TUNEL, fixed PI, PARP cleavage) and synergy determined by evaluating the combination index. The mechanisms of action were evaluated using functional, molecular, and pharmacologic approaches. RESULTS: We demonstrate that lovastatin induces apoptosis of ovarian cancer cells in a p53-independent manner and synergizes with doxorubicin, a chemotherapeutic agent used to treat recurrent cases of ovarian cancer. Lovastatin drives ovarian tumor cell death by two mechanisms: first, by blocking HMG-CoA reductase activity, and second, by sensitizing multi-drug resistant cells to doxorubicin by a novel mevalonate-independent mechanism. This inhibition of drug transport, likely through inhibition of P-glycoprotein, potentiates both DNA damage and tumor cell apoptosis. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this research provide pre-clinical data to warrant further evaluation of statins as potential anti-cancer agents to treat ovarian carcinoma. Many statins are inexpensive, off-patent generic drugs that are immediately available for use as anti-cancer agents. We provide evidence that lovastatin triggers apoptosis of ovarian cancer cells as a single agent by a mevalonate-dependent mechanism. Moreover, we also show lovastatin synergizes with doxorubicin, an agent administered for recurrent disease. This synergy occurs by a novel mevalonate-independent mechanism that antagonizes drug resistance, likely by inhibiting P-glycoprotein. These data raise important issues that may impact how statins can best be included in chemotherapy regimens. PMID: 20298590 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher] ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Related Articles Lovastatin induces apoptosis of ovarian cancer cells and synergizes with doxorubicin: potential therapeutic relevance. BMC Cancer. 2010 Mar 18;10(1):103 Authors: Martirosyan A, Clendening JW, Goard CA, Penn LZ ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Ovarian carcinoma is a rarely curable disease, for which new treatment options are required. As agents that block HMG-CoA reductase and the mevalonate pathway, the statin family of drugs are used in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia and have been shown to trigger apoptosis in a tumor-specific manner. Recent clinical trials show that the addition of statins to traditional chemotherapeutic strategies can increase efficacy of targeting statin-sensitive tumors. Our goal was to assess statin-induced apoptosis of ovarian cancer cells, either alone or in combination with chemotherapeutics, and then determine these mechanisms of action. METHODS: The effect of lovastatin on ovarian cancer cell lines was evaluated alone and in combination with cisplatin and doxorubicin using several assays (MTT, TUNEL, fixed PI, PARP cleavage) and synergy determined by evaluating the combination index. The mechanisms of action were evaluated using functional, molecular, and pharmacologic approaches. RESULTS: We demonstrate that lovastatin induces apoptosis of ovarian cancer cells in a p53-independent manner and synergizes with doxorubicin, a chemotherapeutic agent used to treat recurrent cases of ovarian cancer. Lovastatin drives ovarian tumor cell death by two mechanisms: first, by blocking HMG-CoA reductase activity, and second, by sensitizing multi-drug resistant cells to doxorubicin by a novel mevalonate-independent mechanism. This inhibition of drug transport, likely through inhibition of P-glycoprotein, potentiates both DNA damage and tumor cell apoptosis. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this research provide pre-clinical data to warrant further evaluation of statins as potential anti-cancer agents to treat ovarian carcinoma. Many statins are inexpensive, off-patent generic drugs that are immediately available for use as anti-cancer agents. We provide evidence that lovastatin triggers apoptosis of ovarian cancer cells as a single agent by a mevalonate-dependent mechanism. Moreover, we also show lovastatin synergizes with doxorubicin, an agent administered for recurrent disease. This synergy occurs by a novel mevalonate-independent mechanism that antagonizes drug resistance, likely by inhibiting P-glycoprotein. These data raise important issues that may impact how statins can best be included in chemotherapy regimens. PMID: 20298590 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher] </p>
<p>The rest is here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?tmpl=NoSidebarfile&amp;db=PubMed&amp;cmd=Retrieve&amp;list_uids=20298590&amp;dopt=Abstract" title="Lovastatin induces apoptosis of ovarian cancer cells and synergizes with...">Lovastatin induces apoptosis of ovarian cancer cells and synergizes with&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.genericsamples.com/wp/lovastatin-induces-apoptosis-of-ovarian-cancer-cells-and-synergizes-with/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In Silico Preclinical Trials: Methodology and Engineering Guide to&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.genericsamples.com/wp/in-silico-preclinical-trials-methodology-and-engineering-guide-to/</link>
		<comments>http://www.genericsamples.com/wp/in-silico-preclinical-trials-methodology-and-engineering-guide-to/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Generic Medications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[a-recent-meal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[j diabetes sci technol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research-center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silico-patients]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.genericsamples.com/wp/in-silico-preclinical-trials-methodology-and-engineering-guide-to/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ In Silico Preclinical Trials: Methodology and Engineering Guide to Closed-Loop Control in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009;3(2):269-282 Authors: Patek SD, Bequette BW, Breton M, Buckingham BA, Dassau E, Doyle FJ, Lum J, Magni L, Zisser H This article sets forth guidelines for in silico (simulation-based) proof-of-concept testing of artificial pancreas control algorithms. The goal was to design a test procedure that can facilitate regulatory approval [e.g., Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption] for General Clinical Research Center experiments without preliminary testing on animals. The methodology is designed around a software package, based on a recent meal simulation model of the glucose-insulin system. Putting a premium on generality, this document starts by specifying a generic, rather abstract, meta-algorithm for control. The meta-algorithm has two main components: (1) patient assessment and tuning of control parameters, i.e., algorithmic processes for collection and processing patient data prior to closed-loop operation, and (2) controller warm-up and run-time operation, i.e., algorithmic processes for initializing controller states and managing blood glucose. The simulation-based testing methodology is designed to reveal the conceptual/mathematical operation of both main components, as applied to a large population of in silico patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. PMID: 20144358 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher] ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> In Silico Preclinical Trials: Methodology and Engineering Guide to Closed-Loop Control in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009;3(2):269-282 Authors: Patek SD, Bequette BW, Breton M, Buckingham BA, Dassau E, Doyle FJ, Lum J, Magni L, Zisser H This article sets forth guidelines for in silico (simulation-based) proof-of-concept testing of artificial pancreas control algorithms. The goal was to design a test procedure that can facilitate regulatory approval [e.g., Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption] for General Clinical Research Center experiments without preliminary testing on animals. The methodology is designed around a software package, based on a recent meal simulation model of the glucose-insulin system. Putting a premium on generality, this document starts by specifying a generic, rather abstract, meta-algorithm for control. The meta-algorithm has two main components: (1) patient assessment and tuning of control parameters, i.e., algorithmic processes for collection and processing patient data prior to closed-loop operation, and (2) controller warm-up and run-time operation, i.e., algorithmic processes for initializing controller states and managing blood glucose. The simulation-based testing methodology is designed to reveal the conceptual/mathematical operation of both main components, as applied to a large population of in silico patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. PMID: 20144358 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher] </p>
<p>Follow this link:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?tmpl=NoSidebarfile&amp;db=PubMed&amp;cmd=Retrieve&amp;list_uids=20144358&amp;dopt=Abstract" title="In Silico Preclinical Trials: Methodology and Engineering Guide to...">In Silico Preclinical Trials: Methodology and Engineering Guide to&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.genericsamples.com/wp/in-silico-preclinical-trials-methodology-and-engineering-guide-to/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Demonstrating Bioequivalence of Locally Acting Orally Inhaled Drug Products&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.genericsamples.com/wp/demonstrating-bioequivalence-of-locally-acting-orally-inhaled-drug-products/</link>
		<comments>http://www.genericsamples.com/wp/demonstrating-bioequivalence-of-locally-acting-orally-inhaled-drug-products/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 14:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmaceuticals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.genericsamples.com/wp/demonstrating-bioequivalence-of-locally-acting-orally-inhaled-drug-products/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Demonstrating Bioequivalence of Locally Acting Orally Inhaled Drug Products (OIPs): Workshop Summary Report. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2010 Feb;23(1):1-29 Authors: Adams WP, Ahrens RC, Chen ML, Christopher D, Chowdhury BA, Conner DP, Dalby R, Fitzgerald K, Hendeles L, Hickey AJ, Hochhaus G, Laube BL, Lucas P, Lee SL, Lyapustina S, Li B, O'Connor D, Parikh N, Parkins DA, Peri P, Pitcairn GR, Riebe M, Roy P, Shah T, Singh GJ, Sharp SS, Suman JD, Weda M, Woodcock J, Yu L Abstract This March 2009 Workshop Summary Report was sponsored by Product Quality Research Institute (PQRI) based on a proposal by the Inhalation and Nasal Technology Focus Group (INTFG) of the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS). Participants from the pharmaceutical industry, academia and regulatory bodies from the United States, Europe, India, and Brazil attended the workshop with the objective of presenting, reviewing, and discussing recommendations for demonstrating bioequivalence (BE) that may be considered in the development of orally inhaled drug products and regulatory guidances for new drug applications (NDAs), abbreviated NDAs (ANDAs), and postapproval changes. The workshop addressed areas related to in vitro approaches to demonstrating BE, biomarker strategies, imaging techniques, in vivo approaches to establishing local delivery equivalence and device design similarity. The workshop presented material that provided a baseline for the current understanding of orally inhaled drug products (OIPs) and identified gaps in knowledge and consensus that, if answered, might allow the design of a robust, streamlined method for the BE assessment of locally acting inhalation drugs. These included the following: (1) cascade impactor (CI) studies are not a good 2 predictor of the pulmonary dose; more detailed studies on in vitro/in vivo correlations (e.g., suitability of CI studies for assessing differences in the regional deposition) are needed; (2) there is a lack of consensus on the appropriate statistical methods for assessing in vitro results; (3) fully validated and standardized imaging methods, while capable of providing information on pulmonary dose and regional deposition, might not be applicable to the BE of inhaled products mainly due to the problems of having access to radiolabeled innovator product; (4) if alternatives to current methods for establishing local delivery BE of OIPs cannot be established, biomarkers (pharmacodynamic or clinical endpoints) with a sufficiently steep dose-response need to be identified and validated for all relevant drug classes; and (5) the utility of pharmacokinetic studies for evaluating "local pulmonary delivery" equivalence deserves more attention. A summary of action items for seminars and working groups to address these topics in the future is also presented. PMID: 20131983 [PubMed - in process] ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Demonstrating Bioequivalence of Locally Acting Orally Inhaled Drug Products (OIPs): Workshop Summary Report. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2010 Feb;23(1):1-29 Authors: Adams WP, Ahrens RC, Chen ML, Christopher D, Chowdhury BA, Conner DP, Dalby R, Fitzgerald K, Hendeles L, Hickey AJ, Hochhaus G, Laube BL, Lucas P, Lee SL, Lyapustina S, Li B, O&#8217;Connor D, Parikh N, Parkins DA, Peri P, Pitcairn GR, Riebe M, Roy P, Shah T, Singh GJ, Sharp SS, Suman JD, Weda M, Woodcock J, Yu L Abstract This March 2009 Workshop Summary Report was sponsored by Product Quality Research Institute (PQRI) based on a proposal by the Inhalation and Nasal Technology Focus Group (INTFG) of the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS). Participants from the pharmaceutical industry, academia and regulatory bodies from the United States, Europe, India, and Brazil attended the workshop with the objective of presenting, reviewing, and discussing recommendations for demonstrating bioequivalence (BE) that may be considered in the development of orally inhaled drug products and regulatory guidances for new drug applications (NDAs), abbreviated NDAs (ANDAs), and postapproval changes. The workshop addressed areas related to in vitro approaches to demonstrating BE, biomarker strategies, imaging techniques, in vivo approaches to establishing local delivery equivalence and device design similarity. The workshop presented material that provided a baseline for the current understanding of orally inhaled drug products (OIPs) and identified gaps in knowledge and consensus that, if answered, might allow the design of a robust, streamlined method for the BE assessment of locally acting inhalation drugs. These included the following: (1) cascade impactor (CI) studies are not a good 2 predictor of the pulmonary dose; more detailed studies on in vitro/in vivo correlations (e.g., suitability of CI studies for assessing differences in the regional deposition) are needed; (2) there is a lack of consensus on the appropriate statistical methods for assessing in vitro results; (3) fully validated and standardized imaging methods, while capable of providing information on pulmonary dose and regional deposition, might not be applicable to the BE of inhaled products mainly due to the problems of having access to radiolabeled innovator product; (4) if alternatives to current methods for establishing local delivery BE of OIPs cannot be established, biomarkers (pharmacodynamic or clinical endpoints) with a sufficiently steep dose-response need to be identified and validated for all relevant drug classes; and (5) the utility of pharmacokinetic studies for evaluating &#8220;local pulmonary delivery&#8221; equivalence deserves more attention. A summary of action items for seminars and working groups to address these topics in the future is also presented. PMID: 20131983 [PubMed - in process] </p>
<p>Go here to read the rest:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?tmpl=NoSidebarfile&amp;db=PubMed&amp;cmd=Retrieve&amp;list_uids=20131983&amp;dopt=Abstract" title="Demonstrating Bioequivalence of Locally Acting Orally Inhaled Drug Products...">Demonstrating Bioequivalence of Locally Acting Orally Inhaled Drug Products&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.genericsamples.com/wp/demonstrating-bioequivalence-of-locally-acting-orally-inhaled-drug-products/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Framing access to medicines in developing countries: an analysis of media&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.genericsamples.com/wp/framing-access-to-medicines-in-developing-countries-an-analysis-of-media/</link>
		<comments>http://www.genericsamples.com/wp/framing-access-to-medicines-in-developing-countries-an-analysis-of-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 16:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Generic Medications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmaceuticals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bmc int health hum rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[study]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.genericsamples.com/wp/framing-access-to-medicines-in-developing-countries-an-analysis-of-media/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Framing access to medicines in developing countries: an analysis of media coverage of Canada's Access to Medicines Regime. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2010 Jan 4;10(1):1 Authors: Esmail LC, Phillips K, Kuek V, Perez Cosio A, Kohler JC ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: In September 2003, the Canadian government committed to developing legislation that would facilitate greater access to affordable medicines for developing countries. Over the course of eight months, the legislation, now known as Canada's Access to Medicines Regime (CAMR), went through a controversial policy development process and the newspaper media was one of the major venues in which the policy debates took place. The purpose of this study was to examine how the media framed CAMR to determine how policy goals were conceptualized, which stakeholder interests controlled the public debate and how these variables related to the public policy process. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative content analysis of newspaper coverage of the CAMR policy and implementation process from 2003-2008. The primary theoretical framework for this study was framing theory. A total of 90 articles from 11 Canadian newspapers were selected for inclusion in our analysis. A team of four researchers coded the articles for themes relating to access to medicines and which stakeholders' voice figured more prominently on each issue. Stakeholders examined included: the research-based industry, the generic industry, civil society, the Canadian government, and developing country representatives. RESULTS: The most frequently mentioned themes across all documents were the issues of drug affordability, intellectual property, trade agreements and obligations, and development. Issues such as human rights, pharmaceutical innovation, and economic competitiveness got little media representation. Civil society dominated the media contents, followed far behind by the Canadian government, the research-based and generic pharmaceutical industries. Developing country representatives were hardly represented in the media. CONCLUSIONS: Media framing obscured the discussion of some of the underlying policy goals in this case and failed to highlight issues which are now significant barriers to the use of the legislation. Using the media to engage the public in more in-depth exploration of the policy issues at stake may contribute to a more informed policy development process. The media can be an effective channel for those stakeholders with a weaker voice in policy deliberations to raise public attention to particular issues; however, the political and institutional context must be taken into account as it may outweigh media framing effects. PMID: 20044940 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher] ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Framing access to medicines in developing countries: an analysis of media coverage of Canada&#8217;s Access to Medicines Regime. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2010 Jan 4;10(1):1 Authors: Esmail LC, Phillips K, Kuek V, Perez Cosio A, Kohler JC ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: In September 2003, the Canadian government committed to developing legislation that would facilitate greater access to affordable medicines for developing countries. Over the course of eight months, the legislation, now known as Canada&#8217;s Access to Medicines Regime (CAMR), went through a controversial policy development process and the newspaper media was one of the major venues in which the policy debates took place. The purpose of this study was to examine how the media framed CAMR to determine how policy goals were conceptualized, which stakeholder interests controlled the public debate and how these variables related to the public policy process. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative content analysis of newspaper coverage of the CAMR policy and implementation process from 2003-2008. The primary theoretical framework for this study was framing theory. A total of 90 articles from 11 Canadian newspapers were selected for inclusion in our analysis. A team of four researchers coded the articles for themes relating to access to medicines and which stakeholders&#8217; voice figured more prominently on each issue. Stakeholders examined included: the research-based industry, the generic industry, civil society, the Canadian government, and developing country representatives. RESULTS: The most frequently mentioned themes across all documents were the issues of drug affordability, intellectual property, trade agreements and obligations, and development. Issues such as human rights, pharmaceutical innovation, and economic competitiveness got little media representation. Civil society dominated the media contents, followed far behind by the Canadian government, the research-based and generic pharmaceutical industries. Developing country representatives were hardly represented in the media. CONCLUSIONS: Media framing obscured the discussion of some of the underlying policy goals in this case and failed to highlight issues which are now significant barriers to the use of the legislation. Using the media to engage the public in more in-depth exploration of the policy issues at stake may contribute to a more informed policy development process. The media can be an effective channel for those stakeholders with a weaker voice in policy deliberations to raise public attention to particular issues; however, the political and institutional context must be taken into account as it may outweigh media framing effects. PMID: 20044940 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher] </p>
<p>Visit link:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?tmpl=NoSidebarfile&amp;db=PubMed&amp;cmd=Retrieve&amp;list_uids=20044940&amp;dopt=Abstract" title="Framing access to medicines in developing countries: an analysis of media...">Framing access to medicines in developing countries: an analysis of media&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.genericsamples.com/wp/framing-access-to-medicines-in-developing-countries-an-analysis-of-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Statin prescribing in Northern Ireland and England pre and post&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.genericsamples.com/wp/statin-prescribing-in-northern-ireland-and-england-pre-and-post/</link>
		<comments>http://www.genericsamples.com/wp/statin-prescribing-in-northern-ireland-and-england-pre-and-post/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 11:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Generic Medications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmaceuticals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[introduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[northern-ireland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.genericsamples.com/wp/statin-prescribing-in-northern-ireland-and-england-pre-and-post/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Statin prescribing in Northern Ireland and England pre and post introduction of the quality and outcomes framework. Pharm World Sci. 2009 Oct 31; Authors: Alabbadi I, Crealey G, Turner K, Rafferty T, Keenan L, Murray P, McElnay JC Objective The objective of this research was to examine differences in patterns of statin prescribing between Northern Ireland and England both before and after the introduction of the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF). Setting: Primary care practices in Northern Ireland and England. Method Northern Ireland practices were matched with practices in England, statin prescribing data and QOF achievement scores (for the first year post-QOF) were obtained. Crude prescribing data from matched practices were manipulated to provide a data set of Defined Daily Doses (DDDs)/1,000 patients and cost/DDD/1,000 patients for each statin drug entity covering 1 year before and after the introduction of QOF. QOF achievements were converted into percentage scores for matched practices. Main outcome measure Cost per defined daily dose (DDD) per 1,000 patients. Results Significantly less statins (DDD/1,000 patients) were dispensed in Northern Ireland compared with the matched region in England both before and after the introduction of QOF (P < 0.001). However, significantly more statins were dispensed in both regions after the introduction of QOF. As a result of the introduction of QOF, the cost/DDD/1,000 patients rose by pound13.17 in NI, but fell by pound3.76 in the matched region in England. Conclusion Strategies should be considered to educate prescribers on cost-effectiveness by increasing their awareness of the negative budgetary impact resulting from early adoption of new and expensive statins and by encouraging generic prescribing. PMID: 19882233 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher] ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Statin prescribing in Northern Ireland and England pre and post introduction of the quality and outcomes framework. Pharm World Sci. 2009 Oct 31; Authors: Alabbadi I, Crealey G, Turner K, Rafferty T, Keenan L, Murray P, McElnay JC Objective The objective of this research was to examine differences in patterns of statin prescribing between Northern Ireland and England both before and after the introduction of the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF). Setting: Primary care practices in Northern Ireland and England. Method Northern Ireland practices were matched with practices in England, statin prescribing data and QOF achievement scores (for the first year post-QOF) were obtained. Crude prescribing data from matched practices were manipulated to provide a data set of Defined Daily Doses (DDDs)/1,000 patients and cost/DDD/1,000 patients for each statin drug entity covering 1 year before and after the introduction of QOF. QOF achievements were converted into percentage scores for matched practices. Main outcome measure Cost per defined daily dose (DDD) per 1,000 patients. Results Significantly less statins (DDD/1,000 patients) were dispensed in Northern Ireland compared with the matched region in England both before and after the introduction of QOF (P < 0.001). However, significantly more statins were dispensed in both regions after the introduction of QOF. As a result of the introduction of QOF, the cost/DDD/1,000 patients rose by pound13.17 in NI, but fell by pound3.76 in the matched region in England. Conclusion Strategies should be considered to educate prescribers on cost-effectiveness by increasing their awareness of the negative budgetary impact resulting from early adoption of new and expensive statins and by encouraging generic prescribing. PMID: 19882233 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher] </p>
<p>Go here to see the original:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?tmpl=NoSidebarfile&amp;db=PubMed&amp;cmd=Retrieve&amp;list_uids=19882233&amp;dopt=Abstract" title="Statin prescribing in Northern Ireland and England pre and post...">Statin prescribing in Northern Ireland and England pre and post&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.genericsamples.com/wp/statin-prescribing-in-northern-ireland-and-england-pre-and-post/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Express Your Social Self: Cultural Differences in Choice of Brand-Name Versus Generic Products.</title>
		<link>http://www.genericsamples.com/wp/express-your-social-self-cultural-differences-in-choice-of-brand-name-versus-generic-products/</link>
		<comments>http://www.genericsamples.com/wp/express-your-social-self-cultural-differences-in-choice-of-brand-name-versus-generic-products/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Generic Medications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[achieve-similar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coronary-heart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drug-selection-]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national-health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psychol-bull-]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-importance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[were-identified]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.genericsamples.com/wp/express-your-social-self-cultural-differences-in-choice-of-brand-name-versus-generic-products/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Related Articles Express Your Social Self: Cultural Differences in Choice of Brand-Name Versus Generic Products. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2009 Oct 9; Authors: Kim HS, Drolet A This research examined cultural differences in the patterns of choices that reflect more social characteristics of a chooser (e.g., social status)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
<table border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="right"><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&#038;cmd=Display&#038;dopt=PubMed_PubMed&#038;from_uid=19820179">Related Articles</a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><b>Express Your Social Self: Cultural Differences in Choice of Brand-Name Versus Generic Products.</b></p>
<p>Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2009 Oct 9;</p>
<p>Authors:  Kim HS, Drolet A</p>
<p>This research examined cultural differences in the patterns of choices that reflect more social characteristics of a chooser (e.g., social status). Four studies examined the cultural difference in individuals&#8217; tendency to choose brand-name products (i.e., high-status options) over generic products (i.e., low-status options) and the underlying reasons for these differences. Compared to European Americans, Asian Americans consistently chose brand-name products. This difference was driven by Asian Americans&#8217; greater social status concerns. Self-consciousness was more strongly associated with the brand-name choices of Asian Americans (vs. European Americans), and experimentally induced social status led Asian Americans (vs. European Americans) to make more choices concordant with self-perception. These findings highlight the importance of considering external and social motivations underlying the choicemaking process.</p>
<p>PMID: 19820179 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]</p>
</p>
<p>Originally posted here: <br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?tmpl=NoSidebarfile&amp;db=PubMed&amp;cmd=Retrieve&amp;list_uids=19820179&amp;dopt=Abstract" title="Express Your Social Self: Cultural Differences in Choice of Brand-Name Versus Generic Products.">Express Your Social Self: Cultural Differences in Choice of Brand-Name Versus Generic Products.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.genericsamples.com/wp/express-your-social-self-cultural-differences-in-choice-of-brand-name-versus-generic-products/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
